Novikoff v. Novikoff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Novikoff v. Novikoff

29 A.D.2d 754, 287 N.Y.S.2d 697, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4525

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 29, 1968

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 29 A.D.2d 754 (Novikoff v. Novikoff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Novikoff v. Novikoff, 29 A.D.2d 754, 287 N.Y.S.2d 697, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4525 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of the Family Court, entered May 4, 1966, after a consolidated hearing, dismissing petition for support from husband and denying petition to compel daughter to defray infant’s dental bills and increase current support, unani[755]*755mously reversed, on the law and the facts, and matter remanded for further testimony, without caste or disbursements to either party. The petitioner is now on welfare and there is need of current testimony as to the husband’s ability to contribute to her support. In the event there is a balance remaining unpaid upon the dental bills of the infant which are properly an obligation of both parents, and pending a hearing, each will contribute $12.50 per month towards the balance of this bill, providing the doctor has completed or continues the required treatment. Further, pending a new hearing, in view of the infant’s age and the mother’s earning capacity, her contribution to the support of the infant shall be increased to $15 per week. Settle order on notice. Concur — Steuer, J. P., Capozzoli, McGivern, McNally and Bastow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the Family Court, entered May 4, 1966, after a consolidated hearing, dismissing petition for support from husband and denying petition to compel daughter to defray infant’s dental bills and increase current support, unani[755]*755mously reversed, on the law and the facts, and matter remanded for further testimony, without caste or disbursements to either party. The petitioner is now on welfare and there is need of current testimony as to the husband’s ability to contribute to her support. In the event there is a balance remaining unpaid upon the dental bills of the infant which are properly an obligation of both parents, and pending a hearing, each will contribute $12.50 per month towards the balance of this bill, providing the doctor has completed or continues the required treatment. Further, pending a new hearing, in view of the infant’s age and the mother’s earning capacity, her contribution to the support of the infant shall be increased to $15 per week. Settle order on notice. Concur — Steuer, J. P., Capozzoli, McGivern, McNally and Bastow, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 A.D.2d 754, 287 N.Y.S.2d 697, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4525, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/novikoff-v-novikoff-nyappdiv-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack