Novick Vs. Summerlin N. Cmty. Ass'N

484 P.3d 949

• Court: Nevada Supreme Court
• Decided: April 8, 2021
• Docket: 82434
• Status: Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

MICHAEL J. NOVICK; AND EMILY S. No. 82434 NOVICK, Appellants, vs. SUMMERLIN NORTH COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, A NEVADA NON- .% H. ti 4 PROFIT COOPERATIVE o CORPORATION; CITIMORTGAGE, INC., A NEW YORK CORPORATION; APR C 8 2021 AND CITIBANK, N.A., A NATIONAL CLE< et: BANKING ASSOCIATION, D' Respondents.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from an order granting in part and denying in part respondents motion for summary judgment. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Mark R. Denton, Judge. Review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the district court has not entered a final written judgment adjudicating all the rights and liabilities of all the parties, and the district court did not certify its order as final pursuant to NRCP 54(b). Lee v. GNLV Corp., 116 Nev. 424, 996 P.2d 416 (2000); KDI Sylvan Pools v. Workman, 107 Nev. 340, 810 P.2d 1217 (1991); Rae v. All American Life & Cas. Co., 95 Nev. 920, 605 P.2d 196 (1979). The district court expressly stated in its order that the claim for

SUPREME COURT Of NEVADA

4(11 1947A ate*. breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing remains pending. This court lack jurisdiction and ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

6‘I'rAJ J. Cadish

J.

cc: Hon. Mark R. Denton, District Judge Emily S. Novick Michael J. Novick Akerman LLP/Las Vegas Lipson Neilson P.C. Eighth District Court Clerk