Novello v. Dreier Structural Steel Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Novello v. Dreier Structural Steel Co.

282 A.D. 1058, 126 N.Y.S.2d 911, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5811

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 14, 1953

StatusPublished

This text of 282 A.D. 1058 (Novello v. Dreier Structural Steel Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Novello v. Dreier Structural Steel Co., 282 A.D. 1058, 126 N.Y.S.2d 911, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5811 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the jury rendered a verdict for defendants, finding that both parties were negligent and recommended that plaintiff be reimbursed for medical expenses already incurred. Thereafter the court set aside the verdict on the grounds that it was contrary to law, contrary to the weight of the evidence and contrary to the charge of the court, granted a new trial, and denied defendants’ motion to enter the verdict as one in their favor. Thereafter the court resettled the order so as to direct the verdict to be entered as one in favor of defendants and against plaintiff and so as to set aside such verdict only on the ground that it was contrary to the weight of the evidence and to grant a new trial. Plaintiff and defendants appeal from the order as resettled insofar as it is in favor of the other. Resettled order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Adel, Wenzel, MacCrate and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the jury rendered a verdict for defendants, finding that both parties were negligent and recommended that plaintiff be reimbursed for medical expenses already incurred. Thereafter the court set aside the verdict on the grounds that it was contrary to law, contrary to the weight of the evidence and contrary to the charge of the court, granted a new trial, and denied defendants’ motion to enter the verdict as one in their favor. Thereafter the court resettled the order so as to direct the verdict to be entered as one in favor of defendants and against plaintiff and so as to set aside such verdict only on the ground that it was contrary to the weight of the evidence and to grant a new trial. Plaintiff and defendants appeal from the order as resettled insofar as it is in favor of the other. Resettled order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Adel, Wenzel, MacCrate and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

282 A.D. 1058, 126 N.Y.S.2d 911, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5811, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/novello-v-dreier-structural-steel-co-nyappdiv-1953.