Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Novaro v. Novaro

Novaro v. Novaro

898 So. 2d 272, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 4650, 2005 WL 767074
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 6, 2005
DocketNo. 4D04-1202
StatusPublished

This text of 898 So. 2d 272 (Novaro v. Novaro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Novaro v. Novaro, 898 So. 2d 272, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 4650, 2005 WL 767074 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s rule 1.540 motion to set aside judgment in this proceeding for modification of the dissolution of marriage judgment. However, we reverse the order requiring the former husband to contribute to the former wife’s attorney’s fees, because the only evidence before the trial court showed that the former wife was in a superior financial position to pay her attorney’s fees. See Wait v. Wait, 886 So.2d 318 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004); Hackney v. Hackney, 560 So.2d 423 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).

KLEIN, SHAHOOD and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wait v. Wait
886 So. 2d 318 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Hackney v. Hackney
560 So. 2d 423 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
898 So. 2d 272, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 4650, 2005 WL 767074, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/novaro-v-novaro-fladistctapp-2005.