Novack v. Novack

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Novack v. Novack

15 A.D.2d 671, 224 N.Y.S.2d 218, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11923

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 22, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 15 A.D.2d 671 (Novack v. Novack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Novack v. Novack, 15 A.D.2d 671, 224 N.Y.S.2d 218, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11923 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

Under the circumstances disclosed by this record the allowance of alimony pendente lite was excessive. However, our award of $100 a week, which is based on affidavits, should have no effect on the trial court in its determination as to the amount of the permanent alimony (if any) to be awarded, based on all the facts as developed at the trial (Goldberg v. Goldberg, 4 A D 2d 884; Hall v. Hall, 10 A D 2d 886; Vecchiarello v. Vecchiarello, 10 A D 2d 890). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Rabin, JJ., concur; Hill, J., dissents and votes to modify the order by reducing the alimony to $75 a week; and as thus modified, to affirm the order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Under the circumstances disclosed by this record the allowance of alimony pendente lite was excessive. However, our award of $100 a week, which is based on affidavits, should have no effect on the trial court in its determination as to the amount of the permanent alimony (if any) to be awarded, based on all the facts as developed at the trial (Goldberg v. Goldberg, 4 A D 2d 884; Hall v. Hall, 10 A D 2d 886; Vecchiarello v. Vecchiarello, 10 A D 2d 890). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Rabin, JJ., concur; Hill, J., dissents and votes to modify the order by reducing the alimony to $75 a week; and as thus modified, to affirm the order.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 A.D.2d 671, 224 N.Y.S.2d 218, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11923, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/novack-v-novack-nyappdiv-1962.