Nottingham v. Allstate Ins. Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Nottingham v. Allstate Ins. Co.

1996 Ohio 402, 76 Ohio St. 3d 231

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedAugust 7, 1996

Docket1996-0101

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 1996 Ohio 402 (Nottingham v. Allstate Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nottingham v. Allstate Ins. Co., 1996 Ohio 402, 76 Ohio St. 3d 231 (Ohio 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 76 Ohio St.3d 231.]

NOTTINGHAM ET AL., APPELLEES, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY; NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANT. [Cite as Nottingham v. Allstate Ins. Co., 1996-Ohio-402.] Insurance—Motor vehicles—Pursuant to former R.C. 3937.18, an underinsurance claim must be paid, when—Determining amount of underinsurance coverage to be paid. (No. 96-101—Submitted July 10, 1996—Decided August 7, 1996.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Stark County, No. 1995CA00068. __________________ Tzangas, Plakas & Mannos, James R. Recupero and David L. Dingwell, for appellees. Robert J. Drexler, for appellant. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Cole v. Holland (1996), 76 Ohio St.3d 220, 667 N.E.2d 353. DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., CONCUR. MOYER, C.J., and COOK, J., dissent. STRATTON, J., not participating. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 76 Ohio St.3d 231.]

NOTTINGHAM ET AL., APPELLEES, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY; NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANT. [Cite as Nottingham v. Allstate Ins. Co., 1996-Ohio-402.] Insurance—Motor vehicles—Pursuant to former R.C. 3937.18, an underinsurance claim must be paid, when—Determining amount of underinsurance coverage to be paid. (No. 96-101—Submitted July 10, 1996—Decided August 7, 1996.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Stark County, No. 1995CA00068. __________________ Tzangas, Plakas & Mannos, James R. Recupero and David L. Dingwell, for appellees. Robert J. Drexler, for appellant. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Cole v. Holland (1996), 76 Ohio St.3d 220, 667 N.E.2d 353. DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., CONCUR. MOYER, C.J., and COOK, J., dissent. STRATTON, J., not participating. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1996 Ohio 402, 76 Ohio St. 3d 231, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nottingham-v-allstate-ins-co-ohio-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack