Nott v. Burgess

5 Haw. 420, 1885 Haw. LEXIS 36
CourtHawaii Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 16, 1885
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 5 Haw. 420 (Nott v. Burgess) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nott v. Burgess, 5 Haw. 420, 1885 Haw. LEXIS 36 (haw 1885).

Opinion

Opinion of the Full Court, by

Preston, J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff against a decree made by the Chancellor, on the 22d day of June last, whereby he dismissed the bill for want of Equity.

On a perusal of the papers in the case and the opinion of the Chancellor, we think the decree was properly made; at the same time we adopt the principle stated by the Chancellor, as to the effect of a chattel mortgage upon the property comprised therein.

The appeal is therefore dismissed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

George Hess v. Sam Paulo, Sr.
38 Haw. 279 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1949)
Peabody v. Leong Yen
26 Haw. 63 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1921)
Inter-Island Telegraph Co. v. Liliuokalani
16 Haw. 605 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1905)
McCandless v. Lee Chew
16 Haw. 530 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 Haw. 420, 1885 Haw. LEXIS 36, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nott-v-burgess-haw-1885.