Nott v. Burgess

5 Haw. 420, 1885 Haw. LEXIS 36
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided December 16, 1885·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Opinion of the Full Court, by

Preston, J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff against a decree made by the Chancellor, on the 22d day of June last, whereby he dismissed the bill for want of Equity.

On a perusal of the papers in the case and the opinion of the Chancellor, we think the decree was properly made; at the same time we adopt the principle stated by the Chancellor, as to the effect of a chattel mortgage upon the property comprised therein.

The appeal is therefore dismissed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nott v. Burgess, 5 Haw. 420, 1885 Haw. LEXIS 36 (haw 1885).

5 Haw. 420 (Nott v. Burgess) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

George Hess v. Sam Paulo, Sr.
38 Haw. 279 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1949)
Peabody v. Leong Yen
26 Haw. 63 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1921)
Inter-Island Telegraph Co. v. Liliuokalani
16 Haw. 605 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1905)
McCandless v. Lee Chew
16 Haw. 530 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1905)