Notkin v. Epstein

141 N.E.2d 284, 335 Mass. 769
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided March 28, 1957·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Exceptions overruled. This action to recover damages for breach of a written contract was heard by a judge and taken under advisement. Later the judge found for the defendants and denied certain of the plaintiff’s requests for rulings. The plaintiff seasonably filed a bill of exceptions, which was allowed, but filed no exceptions in writing to any rulings that may have been made in the absence of counsel. See Rule 72 of the Superior Court (1954). The bill of exceptions, not disclosing the saving of any exception in the court below, brings no question of law to this court. Looby v. Looby, 303 Mass. 391, 392. Commonwealth v. MacGregor, 319 Mass. 462. Concannon v. Commissioner of Public Safety, 324 Mass. 503, 508.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Notkin v. Epstein, 141 N.E.2d 284, 335 Mass. 769 (Mass. 1957).

141 N.E.2d 284 (Notkin v. Epstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sherman v. Pritchard
329 N.E.2d 149 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1975)