Noti v. Holiday

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Noti v. Holiday

458 So. 2d 795, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2203, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15566

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 16, 1984

DocketNo. 84-491

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 458 So. 2d 795 (Noti v. Holiday) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Noti v. Holiday, 458 So. 2d 795, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2203, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15566 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court’s order of final judgment entering judgment for Holiday on Noti’s complaint for eviction and imposing a resulting trust on the property in favor of Holiday. Holiday failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence, Hiestand v. Geier, 396 So.2d 744 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 407 So.2d 1103 (Fla. 1981), that Koch (Holiday’s alleged prede[796]*796cessor in interest) had bound himself to an absolute obligation to pay off the mortgage note executed by Noti and his wife, Socarras v. Yaque, 452 So.2d 992 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).

The case is remanded to the trial court with directions to consider the merits of Holiday’s counterclaim seeking damages and the imposition of an equitable lien on the property in question for improvements he had made thereto, such claim having been dismissed as being moot in light of the judgment rendered by the trial court on the parties’ other claims.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court’s order of final judgment entering judgment for Holiday on Noti’s complaint for eviction and imposing a resulting trust on the property in favor of Holiday. Holiday failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence, Hiestand v. Geier, 396 So.2d 744 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 407 So.2d 1103 (Fla. 1981), that Koch (Holiday’s alleged prede[796]*796cessor in interest) had bound himself to an absolute obligation to pay off the mortgage note executed by Noti and his wife, Socarras v. Yaque, 452 So.2d 992 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).

The case is remanded to the trial court with directions to consider the merits of Holiday’s counterclaim seeking damages and the imposition of an equitable lien on the property in question for improvements he had made thereto, such claim having been dismissed as being moot in light of the judgment rendered by the trial court on the parties’ other claims.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

458 So. 2d 795, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2203, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15566, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/noti-v-holiday-fladistctapp-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack