Notgrass, April Michelle AKA May, April Notgrass

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Notgrass, April Michelle AKA May, April Notgrass

DecidedSeptember 24, 2008

DocketWR-70,541-01

StatusPublished

This text of Notgrass, April Michelle AKA May, April Notgrass (Notgrass, April Michelle AKA May, April Notgrass) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Notgrass, April Michelle AKA May, April Notgrass, (Tex. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-70,541-01

EX PARTE APRIL MICHELLE NOTGRASS, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 9546 IN THE 258^TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM SAN JACINTO COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of endangering a child and sentenced to sixteen month's imprisonment in a state jail facility.

The original judgment of the trial court was entered on September 12, 2007 and granted Applicant jail time credit from November 3, 2005 to November 11, 2005; November 18, 2005 to February 1, 2006; April 13, 2006 to May 16, 2006; and August 31, 2007 to the date of judgment. This judgment erroneously awarded jail time credit from before the date of the offense. An order nunc pro tunc was entered by the trial court on November 19, 2007 correcting the jail time and giving Applicant credit from April 13, 2006 to May 16, 2006 and from August 31, 2007 to September 12, 2007 (the date of the original judgment).

Applicant alleges that the Texas Department of Criminal Justice is not giving her all of the jail time credit that was awarded to her on that order nunc pro tunc. The trial court entered findings of fact stating that Applicant spent 104 days in the San Jacinto County Jail and recommends that Applicant receive credit for that time and that this Court grant relief. Specifically, the trial court finds that Applicant was in the San Jacinto County Jail from April 13, 2006 to May 16, 2006; and from August 31, 2007 to November 9, 2007.

Applicant's records reflect that she is receiving the proper amount of pre-sentence jail time credit as reflected on the trial court's order nunc pro tunc and all of her post-sentence jail time credit.

Based on this Court's independent review of the entire record, we deny relief.

It is so ordered on this the 24^th day of September, 2008.

Filed: September 24, 2008

Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-70,541-01

EX PARTE APRIL MICHELLE NOTGRASS, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 9546 IN THE 258^TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM SAN JACINTO COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of endangering a child and sentenced to sixteen month's imprisonment in a state jail facility.

The original judgment of the trial court was entered on September 12, 2007 and granted Applicant jail time credit from November 3, 2005 to November 11, 2005; November 18, 2005 to February 1, 2006; April 13, 2006 to May 16, 2006; and August 31, 2007 to the date of judgment. This judgment erroneously awarded jail time credit from before the date of the offense. An order nunc pro tunc was entered by the trial court on November 19, 2007 correcting the jail time and giving Applicant credit from April 13, 2006 to May 16, 2006 and from August 31, 2007 to September 12, 2007 (the date of the original judgment).

Applicant alleges that the Texas Department of Criminal Justice is not giving her all of the jail time credit that was awarded to her on that order nunc pro tunc. The trial court entered findings of fact stating that Applicant spent 104 days in the San Jacinto County Jail and recommends that Applicant receive credit for that time and that this Court grant relief. Specifically, the trial court finds that Applicant was in the San Jacinto County Jail from April 13, 2006 to May 16, 2006; and from August 31, 2007 to November 9, 2007.

Applicant's records reflect that she is receiving the proper amount of pre-sentence jail time credit as reflected on the trial court's order nunc pro tunc and all of her post-sentence jail time credit.

Based on this Court's independent review of the entire record, we deny relief.

It is so ordered on this the 24^th day of September, 2008.

Filed: September 24, 2008

Do not publish

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Notgrass, April Michelle AKA May, April Notgrass, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/notgrass-april-michelle-aka-may-april-notgrass-texcrimapp-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack