Notarianni v. Notarianni

584 So. 2d 234, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 8202, 1991 WL 165080
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Notarianni v. Notarianni. Read the opinion of the Court — 622 So. 2d 1144
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 23, 1991·No. No. 90-00780·Published

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of appellee’s motion for clarification, we hereby grant appellee’s motion, and substitute the attached opinion for the one previously issued.

LEHAN, A.C.J., and PARKER and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.

We reverse the final judgment of dissolution of marriage to the extent it ordered the partition. Partition was not pleaded, stipulated to, or tried by consent. See Ellis v. Ellis, 542 So.2d 450, 451 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); Labarre v. Labarre, 382 So.2d 761 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980). On remand, the issue of attorney’s fees should be considered in light of Smith v. Smith, 495 So.2d 229 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986).

LEHAN, A.C.J., and PARKER and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Notarianni v. Notarianni, 584 So. 2d 234, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 8202, 1991 WL 165080 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

584 So. 2d 234 (Notarianni v. Notarianni) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Smith
495 So. 2d 229 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Labarre v. Labarre
382 So. 2d 761 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Ellis v. Ellis
542 So. 2d 450 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)