Nostrom v. Aw Chesterton Company

921 N.E.2d 597, 13 N.Y.3d 880, 2009 NY Slip Op 89909, 893 N.Y.S.2d 830, 2009 N.Y. LEXIS 4157
New York Court of Appeals·Decided December 1, 2009·No. Motion No: 2009-1085·Published

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., dismissed upon the ground that as to that party the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise granted.

Chief Judge Lippman and Judge Read taking no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nostrom v. Aw Chesterton Company, 921 N.E.2d 597, 13 N.Y.3d 880, 2009 NY Slip Op 89909, 893 N.Y.S.2d 830, 2009 N.Y. LEXIS 4157 (N.Y. 2009).

921 N.E.2d 597 (Nostrom v. Aw Chesterton Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.