Nostro v. Giangrande

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Nostro v. Giangrande

2 A.D.2d 998, 157 N.Y.S.2d 997, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3374

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 28, 1956

StatusPublished

This text of 2 A.D.2d 998 (Nostro v. Giangrande) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nostro v. Giangrande, 2 A.D.2d 998, 157 N.Y.S.2d 997, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3374 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained when two motor vehicles collided at a street intersection, the appeal is from a judgment entered on a decision of the court after trial in favor of respondent against appellant. There is a dispute as to whether respondent was the operator of, or a passenger in, the vehicle in which he was riding. The undisputed evidence shows that this vehicle struck the side of appellant’s vehicle and that respondent suffered abdominal injuries. Judgment reversed and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. The finding that respondent was injured solely by reason of the negligence of appellant is against the weight of the evidence. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Murphy, Ughetta and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained when two motor vehicles collided at a street intersection, the appeal is from a judgment entered on a decision of the court after trial in favor of respondent against appellant. There is a dispute as to whether respondent was the operator of, or a passenger in, the vehicle in which he was riding. The undisputed evidence shows that this vehicle struck the side of appellant’s vehicle and that respondent suffered abdominal injuries. Judgment reversed and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. The finding that respondent was injured solely by reason of the negligence of appellant is against the weight of the evidence. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Murphy, Ughetta and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 A.D.2d 998, 157 N.Y.S.2d 997, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3374, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nostro-v-giangrande-nyappdiv-1956.