Nostrand v. Froehlich
This text of 10 N.Y.3d 837 (Nostrand v. Froehlich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
KAREN L. VAN NOSTRAND, Respondent,
v.
ROSARIO FROEHLICH et al., Appellants.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that the Appellate Division order appealed from, which reversed a Supreme Court order granting a motion to amend a prior final judgment and denied the motion, does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. The effect of the Appellate Division's reversal of Supreme Court's grant of the motion to amend the judgment is to place the parties back precisely where they were under the final determination.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
10 N.Y.3d 837, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nostrand-v-froehlich-ny-2008.