Nosler v. Githens
This text of 9 Iowa 295 (Nosler v. Githens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The original notice was served, by leaving a copy with the wife of each defendant, at their respect-, ive residences; but the return does not show that the defends ants were not found, nor is any cause shown for making the substituted service. Held, That the return was insufficient, and the court erred in rendering judgment against defendants by default. Davis v. Burt. et al, 7 Iowa 56; Chittenden v. Hobbs, et al, infra.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
9 Iowa 295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nosler-v-githens-iowa-1859.