Nosenchuk v. Rosen

261 A.D. 834, 25 N.Y.S.2d 214, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7671

Opinion

On appeal by two of three defendants from an order denying their motion for an order changing the place of trial from the county of Kings to the county of Sullivan, order reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten [835] dollars costs. Upon'the record, appellants are entitled to the change of the place of trial of this ease from. Kings county to Sullivan county. (Mencke v. Goldberg, 208 App. Div. 820; Veeldorano v. Union Railway Co., 183 id. 575; Kramer v. Harder Mfg. Corporation, 218 id. 745; Jacina v. Lemmi. 155 id, 397, 399.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nosenchuk v. Rosen, 261 A.D. 834, 25 N.Y.S.2d 214, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7671 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

261 A.D. 834 (Nosenchuk v. Rosen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mencke v. Goldberg
208 A.D. 820 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1924)