Nosenchuk v. Rosen
This text of 261 A.D. 834 (Nosenchuk v. Rosen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On appeal by two of three defendants from an order denying their motion for an order changing the place of trial from the county of Kings to the county of Sullivan, order reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten [835]*835dollars costs. Upon'the record, appellants are entitled to the change of the place of trial of this ease from. Kings county to Sullivan county. (Mencke v. Goldberg, 208 App. Div. 820; Veeldorano v. Union Railway Co., 183 id. 575; Kramer v. Harder Mfg. Corporation, 218 id. 745; Jacina v. Lemmi. 155 id, 397, 399.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
261 A.D. 834, 25 N.Y.S.2d 214, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7671, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nosenchuk-v-rosen-nyappdiv-1941.