Nosal v. CITY OF POTTERVILLE
723 N.W.2d 840, 477 Mich. 947
Opinion
Joseph NOSAL and Christina Nosal, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
CITY OF POTTERVILLE, Defendant-Appellee, and
Potterville Sewer District, Defendant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 20, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nosal v. CITY OF POTTERVILLE, 723 N.W.2d 840, 477 Mich. 947 (Mich. 2006).
723 N.W.2d 840 (Nosal v. CITY OF POTTERVILLE) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.