Nos. 89-5391, 90-5686

941 F.2d 1200
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedJuly 23, 1991
Docket1200
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 941 F.2d 1200 (Nos. 89-5391, 90-5686) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nos. 89-5391, 90-5686, 941 F.2d 1200 (3d Cir. 1991).

Opinion

941 F.2d 1200

Demenus (Manfred), Van Arthos (Theodore)
v.
Tinton 35, Inc., Tinton 60, Inc., Homes for Today, Inc.,
Marcus (Harvey I.), Jacques Rotnemer Group
Construction Company of Ocean Township,
Inc., Sylvester (Herbert),
Speyer (Colette), Spyco, Inc.

NOS. 89-5391, 90-5686

United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.

JUL 23, 1991

Appeal From: D.N.J.

AFFIRMED.

Procedures, Ch. 5, sec. 5.1, 28 U.S.C.A.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ray v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
502 U.S. 1048 (Supreme Court, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
941 F.2d 1200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nos-89-5391-90-5686-ca3-1991.