Norwood v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Norwood v. State

432 S.W.3d 276, 2014 WL 2187604, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 595

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 27, 2014·No. No. ED 100297·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Allen Norwood (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035 without an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.1(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Allen Norwood (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035 without an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.1(b).

Norwood v. State, 432 S.W.3d 276, 2014 WL 2187604, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 595 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

432 S.W.3d 276 (Norwood v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.