Norwood v. Shipley

1 H. & J. 295
General Court of Virginia·Decided May 15, 1802·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

The Court in this cause determined that the plaintiff must show title to the land on which he charges the trespass to be committed, or he must show that i . ,, ' . „',. , . ,, lie was in the actual possession oí the place where the [296] trespass was committed, at the time when it was committed.

Ridgely, Mason and Shaaff, for Plaintiff. Martin, (Attorney General,) and W. Dorsey, for Defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Norwood v. Shipley, 1 H. & J. 295 (Va. Super. Ct. 1802).

1 H. & J. 295 (Norwood v. Shipley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McAuliffe v. Lerch
57 A.2d 329 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1948)
Giles v. Dirobbio
46 A.2d 611 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1946)
Carter v. Maryland & Pennsylvania Railroad
77 A. 301 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1910)
Casey v. Mason
1899 OK 113 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1899)
Parker v. Wallis
60 Md. 15 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1883)
Blaen Avon Coal Co. v. McCulloh
59 Md. 403 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1883)
Gent v. Lynch
23 Md. 58 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1865)
Ridgely v. Bond
17 Md. 14 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1861)