Norwood v. Pettis

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Norwood v. Pettis

10 La. Ann. 259

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedApril 15, 1855

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 10 La. Ann. 259 (Norwood v. Pettis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Norwood v. Pettis, 10 La. Ann. 259 (La. 1855).

Pincite

Opinion

Slidell, O. J.

As to the contest between Eepburn and the liquidator, we see no reason to change the conclusion to which we came, after alaborate argument in McKneely v. Brown, decided in April, 1854.

Due notice, in 1840, to Norwood, of the assignment to Hepburn, is proved ; and, after notice, Nonoood could not acquire obligations of the assignor, and set them up in compensation to the detriment of the assignee.

-Judgment affirmed ; the costs of appeal to he paid by the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Slidell, O. J.

As to the contest between Eepburn and the liquidator, we see no reason to change the conclusion to which we came, after alaborate argument in McKneely v. Brown, decided in April, 1854.

Due notice, in 1840, to Norwood, of the assignment to Hepburn, is proved ; and, after notice, Nonoood could not acquire obligations of the assignor, and set them up in compensation to the detriment of the assignee.

-Judgment affirmed ; the costs of appeal to he paid by the appellant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 La. Ann. 259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/norwood-v-pettis-la-1855.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack