Norwood v. Hickok

City of New York Municipal Court

Norwood v. Hickok

14 Misc. 236, 35 N.Y.S. 713, 70 N.Y. St. Rep. 448

DecidedOctober 15, 1895

StatusPublished

This text of 14 Misc. 236 (Norwood v. Hickok) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Norwood v. Hickok, 14 Misc. 236, 35 N.Y.S. 713, 70 N.Y. St. Rep. 448 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

Fitzsimons, J.

The evidence shows that the defendant received plaintiff’s bill for services, rendered and promised to pay the same when able. That surely establishes plaintiff’s claim that the services in question were rendered and the [237]*237value thereof was satisfactory to defendant, and, inviewof the failure to introduce evidence in her own behalf, justified the trial judge in directing a verdict against her.

The judgment must be affirmed, with costs.

McCarthy, J., concurs.

■ Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fitzsimons, J.

The evidence shows that the defendant received plaintiff’s bill for services, rendered and promised to pay the same when able. That surely establishes plaintiff’s claim that the services in question were rendered and the [237]*237value thereof was satisfactory to defendant, and, inviewof the failure to introduce evidence in her own behalf, justified the trial judge in directing a verdict against her.

The judgment must be affirmed, with costs.

McCarthy, J., concurs.

■ Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

14 Misc. 236, 35 N.Y.S. 713, 70 N.Y. St. Rep. 448, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/norwood-v-hickok-nynyccityct-1895.