Norwich v. Windham
1 Root 232
Opinion
Said Mary was legally settled in said town of Harwich before her intermarriage with said Laughton a foreigner, who had no settlement in this country; her settlement thereby was suspended, but not lost; upon his going off or dying her right of settlement was revived; for a person doth not lose a settlement until another is gained in some other place.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Norwich v. Windham, 1 Root 232 (Colo. 1790).
1 Root 232 (Norwich v. Windham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Inhabitants of Middletown v. Inhabitants of Lyme
5 Conn. 95 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1823)