Norwich Union Fire Insurance Society v. Bainbridge Grocery Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Norwich Union Fire Insurance Society v. Bainbridge Grocery Co.

91 S.E. 235, 19 Ga. App. 171, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 46

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 23, 1917

Docket7511

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 91 S.E. 235 (Norwich Union Fire Insurance Society v. Bainbridge Grocery Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Norwich Union Fire Insurance Society v. Bainbridge Grocery Co., 91 S.E. 235, 19 Ga. App. 171, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 46 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Beoyles, P. J.

1. The exceptions to the repelling of certain documentary evidence offered by the plaintiff in error, and the exception to the refusal of the court to allow the plaintiff in error to prove certain facts by the witness R. V. Custer, not being referred to in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, are treated as abandoned.

2. Under the pleadings, and the evidence admitted, no error appears in the award of a nonsuit, the prima facie case shown in the petition not being supported by proof.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenlcms and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI