Norwegian Plow Co. v. Mower

60 N.W. 915, 42 Neb. 659, 1894 Neb. LEXIS 472
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 9, 1894
DocketNo. 4817
StatusPublished

This text of 60 N.W. 915 (Norwegian Plow Co. v. Mower) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Norwegian Plow Co. v. Mower, 60 N.W. 915, 42 Neb. 659, 1894 Neb. LEXIS 472 (Neb. 1894).

Opinion

Norval, C. J.

This was an action upon a promissory note executed and delivered by the defendants in error to the Norwegian Plow [660]*660Company for the sum of $103.42 and interest thereon. The petition is in the ordinary form. The defendants filed separate answers, each admitting the execution and delivery of the note, and setting up the defense of payment. The defendant Steiner further answered that he signed the note as surety for his co-defendant, E. B. Mower. The plaintiff replied by a general denial. There was a verdict for the defendants upon which judgment was rendered.

Upon a somewhat careful consideration of the record we are satisfied that the verdict and judgment conform to the pleadings and evidence, and neither party having filed briefs in the case, on the authority of Phenix Ins. Co. of Brooklyn v. Reams, 37 Neb., 423, and Damon v. City of Omaha, 38 Neb., 583, the judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Phenix Insurance v. Reams
55 N.W. 1074 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1893)
Damon v. City of Omaha
57 N.W. 287 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 N.W. 915, 42 Neb. 659, 1894 Neb. LEXIS 472, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/norwegian-plow-co-v-mower-neb-1894.