Norway Savings Bank v. Heirs of Demenkow
This text of Norway Savings Bank v. Heirs of Demenkow (Norway Savings Bank v. Heirs of Demenkow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE OF MAINE SUPERIOR COURT OXFORD, ss. CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO. RE 20 0011
NORWAY SAVINGS BANK
v. ORDER
HEIRS OF DEMENKOW, et. al.
Before the court are Plaintiff's Request for Entry of Default and Motion for Default
Judgment and Summary Judgment. For the reasons stated herein, the court cannot grant
the Motion.
The mortgagor and property owner in this matter is deceased. His estate was not
probated. His heirs include his mother and two sons, all of whom are Defendants and all
of whom have been served. For the most part, the summary judgment motion is in order,
but the following problems prevent the court from granting the motion.
Andrew Demenkow is in active military service. The Soldiers and Sailor's Relief
Act does not allow the court to enter judgment against a member of the military who has
failed to appear. 50 U.S.C. §3912, Real v. Real, 2010 ME 92, 'lI 13. The Plaintiff did not ,
provide evidence of an "affirmative waiver" of the Act's protections. Real, 'IT 13; 50 USC
§ 3918. Therefore, the court cannot enter a judgment binding on Andrew without a
waiver or some other finding.
Timothy Demenkow filed an Answer which prevents a default from being entered
against him. The clerk includes a copy of that Answer with this order in case Plaintiff
did not get a copy. Therefore, the court cannot default Timothy. The court can, however,
grant summary judgment if it otherwise meets the requirement for a foreclosure. If
Timothy wishes to oppose summary judgment, in which the Plaintiff seeks judgment
1 allowing them foredose on the property and does not seek damages from any Defendant,
he needs to file an objection within 21 days.
In addition, the court requires that counsel for the plaintiff confirm that this
mortgage is not subject to any pandemic related order effecting foreclosures. Although
the mortgage is not residential, the court requires that counsel affirmatively state that
there is no state or federal pandemic order affecting this foreclosure.
Therefore, the motion and request for default are DENIED. The Motion for
Summary Judgment is denied, but without prejudice to a supplemental filing to resolve
these issues. The Defendants should be copied on any supplementation with the notices
required by M.R.Civ.P. 7(b).
This Order is incorporated on the docket by reference pursuant to M.R.Civ.P.
79(a).
1.' homa R. McKeon Justice, Maine Superior Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Norway Savings Bank v. Heirs of Demenkow, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/norway-savings-bank-v-heirs-of-demenkow-mesuperct-2021.