Norway Savings Bank v. Heirs of Demenkow

CourtSuperior Court of Maine
DecidedJanuary 26, 2021
DocketOXFre-20-11
StatusUnpublished

This text of Norway Savings Bank v. Heirs of Demenkow (Norway Savings Bank v. Heirs of Demenkow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Norway Savings Bank v. Heirs of Demenkow, (Me. Super. Ct. 2021).

Opinion

STATE OF MAINE SUPERIOR COURT OXFORD, ss. CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO. RE 20 0011

NORWAY SAVINGS BANK

v. ORDER

HEIRS OF DEMENKOW, et. al.

Before the court are Plaintiff's Request for Entry of Default and Motion for Default

Judgment and Summary Judgment. For the reasons stated herein, the court cannot grant

the Motion.

The mortgagor and property owner in this matter is deceased. His estate was not

probated. His heirs include his mother and two sons, all of whom are Defendants and all

of whom have been served. For the most part, the summary judgment motion is in order,

but the following problems prevent the court from granting the motion.

Andrew Demenkow is in active military service. The Soldiers and Sailor's Relief

Act does not allow the court to enter judgment against a member of the military who has

failed to appear. 50 U.S.C. §3912, Real v. Real, 2010 ME 92, 'lI 13. The Plaintiff did not ,

provide evidence of an "affirmative waiver" of the Act's protections. Real, 'IT 13; 50 USC

§ 3918. Therefore, the court cannot enter a judgment binding on Andrew without a

waiver or some other finding.

Timothy Demenkow filed an Answer which prevents a default from being entered

against him. The clerk includes a copy of that Answer with this order in case Plaintiff

did not get a copy. Therefore, the court cannot default Timothy. The court can, however,

grant summary judgment if it otherwise meets the requirement for a foreclosure. If

Timothy wishes to oppose summary judgment, in which the Plaintiff seeks judgment

1 allowing them foredose on the property and does not seek damages from any Defendant,

he needs to file an objection within 21 days.

In addition, the court requires that counsel for the plaintiff confirm that this

mortgage is not subject to any pandemic related order effecting foreclosures. Although

the mortgage is not residential, the court requires that counsel affirmatively state that

there is no state or federal pandemic order affecting this foreclosure.

Therefore, the motion and request for default are DENIED. The Motion for

Summary Judgment is denied, but without prejudice to a supplemental filing to resolve

these issues. The Defendants should be copied on any supplementation with the notices

required by M.R.Civ.P. 7(b).

This Order is incorporated on the docket by reference pursuant to M.R.Civ.P.

79(a).

1.' homa R. McKeon Justice, Maine Superior Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Real v. Real
2010 ME 92 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Norway Savings Bank v. Heirs of Demenkow, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/norway-savings-bank-v-heirs-of-demenkow-mesuperct-2021.