Norway Plains Savings Bank v. Young

36 A. 550, 68 N.H. 13
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided June 5, 1894·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Chase, J.

Questions brought to this court by appeal from a judge of probate are tried anew, as if they had not been tried before. Wallace v. Brown, 25 N. H. 216; Bixby v. Harris, 26 N. H. 125, 128; Cook v. Bennett, 51 N. H. 85, 91; Adams v. Adams, 64 N. H. 224, 227. The character of the trial in the probate-court is therefore not material here. It was found at the trial term, presumably upon competent and sufficient evidence, as no exception on this ground is reported, that the debtor was owing the petitioning creditor more than $300, and was insolvent. This finding supports the decree. P. S., c. 201, s. 42.

Exception overruled..

Blodgett, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Norway Plains Savings Bank v. Young, 36 A. 550, 68 N.H. 13 (N.H. 1894).

36 A. 550 (Norway Plains Savings Bank v. Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Davidson v. Unknown Heirs of Peterson
134 N.W. 751 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1912)