Norville v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Norville v. State

806 So. 2d 581, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 755, 2002 WL 113499

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 30, 2002

DocketNo. 4D01-3521

StatusPublished

This text of 806 So. 2d 581 (Norville v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Norville v. State, 806 So. 2d 581, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 755, 2002 WL 113499 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Lee Norville appeals the summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief, filed pursuant to rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, in which he raised six grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel. We reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing with respect to Nor-ville’s claim that defense counsel was ineffective for failing to call a material witness at trial. Anderson v. State, 796 So.2d 1205 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). Norville alleged that Ms. Richardson was available to testify and her testimony would have supported his position that the confidential informant fabricated the information provided to the detectives.

FARMER, STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Lee Norville appeals the summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief, filed pursuant to rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, in which he raised six grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel. We reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing with respect to Nor-ville’s claim that defense counsel was ineffective for failing to call a material witness at trial. Anderson v. State, 796 So.2d 1205 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). Norville alleged that Ms. Richardson was available to testify and her testimony would have supported his position that the confidential informant fabricated the information provided to the detectives.

FARMER, STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

806 So. 2d 581, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 755, 2002 WL 113499, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/norville-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack