Norvell, Ex Parte Jimmy Dale

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 19, 2011
DocketAP-76,664
StatusPublished

This text of Norvell, Ex Parte Jimmy Dale (Norvell, Ex Parte Jimmy Dale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Norvell, Ex Parte Jimmy Dale, (Tex. 2011).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. AP-76,664

EX PARTE JIMMY DALE NORVELL, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 9692-B IN THE 132ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT FROM SCURRY COUNTY

Per curiam.

OPINION

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure,

the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus.

Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of

felony theft and was sentenced to 5 years’ imprisonment. He did not appeal the conviction.

In this writ application, Applicant contends that his sentence is not authorized by law

because the enhancement of the applicable punishment range from that of a state jail felony

to a third-degree felony was not proper. This claim may be raised before this Court in an 2

Article 11.07 application for a writ of habeas corpus. See Ex parte Rich, 194 S.W.3d 508,

511 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). After an independent review of the record provided, we agree

that the enhancement was not proper. See Rawling v. State, 602 S.W.2d 268, 269-70 (Tex.

Crim. App. 1980). Relief on this claim is therefore granted.

In cases such as this where there was a plea agreement between the parties, “[T]he

proper remedy is to allow Applicant to withdraw his plea and remand the case to the trial

court, putting both parties back in their original positions before they entered into the plea

bargain.” Id. at 514-15. We hold, therefore, that in Cause Number 9692, The State of Texas

v. Jimmy Dale Norvell, in the 132nd Judicial District Court of Scurry County, Applicant’s

conviction and sentence are set aside, and the parties are returned to their respective positions

before they entered into the plea bargain. All other relief is denied.

Applicant is remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of Scurry County, Texas, to

answer the indictment filed against him in Cause Number 9692, The State of Texas v. Jimmy

Dale Norvell, in the 132nd Judicial District Court of Scurry County. The trial court shall

issue any necessary bench warrant within 10 days after the mandate of this Court issues.

Delivered: October 19, 2011

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rawlings v. State
602 S.W.2d 268 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1980)
Ex Parte Rich
194 S.W.3d 508 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2006)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Norvell, Ex Parte Jimmy Dale, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/norvell-ex-parte-jimmy-dale-texcrimapp-2011.