Norval v. Cornell
16 Johns. 73
Opinion
The only question is, whether the penalty was incurred or not. The case of Conkling v. Elting (2 Johns. Rep. 410.) is in point, that the 9th section of the act relative to turnpikes, (1 N.R. L. 234.) does not apply, or inflict a penalty, where toll is demanded of a person entitled to an exemption from paying it. It applies only to the hindering or delaying travellers and passengers bound to pay toll, or for taking more toll than the law allows.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Norval v. Cornell, 16 Johns. 73 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1819).
16 Johns. 73 (Norval v. Cornell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Van Buren v. Wylie
23 N.W. 195 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1885)
Starkweather v. Prince
8 D.C. 144 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1873)
Marr v. Barrett
41 Me. 403 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1856)