Norumbega Co. v. Bennett

Supreme Court

Norumbega Co. v. Bennett

290 U.S. 598, 54 S. Ct. 207

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided December 4, 1933·No. No. 103·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The decree of the District Court herein is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the District Court, as specially constituted, with directions to dismiss the bill of complaint for the want, of jurisdiction, upon the ground that the allegations of the bill do not set forth a substantial federal question. Newburyport Water Co. v. Newburyport, 193 U.S. 561, 576, 579; Levering & Garrigues Co. v. Morrin, 289 U.S. 103, 105; Ex parte Poresky, ante, p. 30.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The decree of the District Court herein is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the District Court, as specially constituted, with directions to dismiss the bill of complaint for the want, of jurisdiction, upon the ground that the allegations of the bill do not set forth a substantial federal question. Newburyport Water Co. v. Newburyport, 193 U.S. 561, 576, 579; Levering & Garrigues Co. v. Morrin, 289 U.S. 103, 105; Ex parte Poresky, ante, p. 30.

Norumbega Co. v. Bennett, 290 U.S. 598, 54 S. Ct. 207 (1933).

Pincite

290 U.S. 598 (Norumbega Co. v. Bennett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related