Norton v. Sweet

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Norton v. Sweet

15 Mass. 169

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedJune 15, 1818

StatusPublished

This text of 15 Mass. 169 (Norton v. Sweet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Norton v. Sweet, 15 Mass. 169 (Mass. 1818).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The replication averring that the note therein described is the same with that mentioned in the condition of the bond, and this fact being agreed by the demurrer, it follows that the date of the note is misrecited in the bond. That note being paid, the condition precedent to the plaintiffs’ right to a conveyance has been performed ; and he is entitled to the conveyance, or to his damages.

Replication adjudged good.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The replication averring that the note therein described is the same with that mentioned in the condition of the bond, and this fact being agreed by the demurrer, it follows that the date of the note is misrecited in the bond. That note being paid, the condition precedent to the plaintiffs’ right to a conveyance has been performed ; and he is entitled to the conveyance, or to his damages.

Replication adjudged good.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 Mass. 169, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/norton-v-sweet-mass-1818.