Norton v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Norton v. State

1912 OK CR 105, 120 P. 1129, 6 Okla. Crim. 740, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 335

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJanuary 27, 1912

DocketNo. A-935.

StatusPublished

This text of 1912 OK CR 105 (Norton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Norton v. State, 1912 OK CR 105, 120 P. 1129, 6 Okla. Crim. 740, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 335 (Okla. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Stephens county on the 8th day of July, 1910, on a charge of libel, and on the 9th day of said month was sentenced by the court, in accordance with the verdict of the jury, to pay a fine of one hundred twenty-live. dollars. A careful examination of the record discloses no errors sufficiently prejudicial to the substantial rights of plaintiff in error to justify a reversal of this cause. Let the judgment of the trial court be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Stephens county on the 8th day of July, 1910, on a charge of libel, and on the 9th day of said month was sentenced by the court, in accordance with the verdict of the jury, to pay a fine of one hundred twenty-live. dollars. A careful examination of the record discloses no errors sufficiently prejudicial to the substantial rights of plaintiff in error to justify a reversal of this cause. Let the judgment of the trial court be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1912 OK CR 105, 120 P. 1129, 6 Okla. Crim. 740, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 335, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/norton-v-state-oklacrimapp-1912.