Norton v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Norton v. State

1912 OK CR 105, 120 P. 1129, 6 Okla. Crim. 740, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 335

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided January 27, 1912·No. No. A-935.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Stephens county on the 8th day of July, 1910, on a charge of libel, and on the 9th day of said month was sentenced by the court, in accordance with the verdict of the jury, to pay a fine of one hundred twenty-live. dollars. A careful examination of the record discloses no errors sufficiently prejudicial to the substantial rights of plaintiff in error to justify a reversal of this cause. Let the judgment of the trial court be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Stephens county on the 8th day of July, 1910, on a charge of libel, and on the 9th day of said month was sentenced by the court, in accordance with the verdict of the jury, to pay a fine of one hundred twenty-live. dollars. A careful examination of the record discloses no errors sufficiently prejudicial to the substantial rights of plaintiff in error to justify a reversal of this cause. Let the judgment of the trial court be affirmed.

Norton v. State, 1912 OK CR 105, 120 P. 1129, 6 Okla. Crim. 740, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 335 (Okla. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

1912 OK CR 105 (Norton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.