Norton v. State

34 Ga. App. 235
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 29, 1925
Docket16599
StatusPublished

This text of 34 Ga. App. 235 (Norton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Norton v. State, 34 Ga. App. 235 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The motion for a new trial contained the usual general grounds only; the verdict was amply authorized by the evidence, and the refusal to grant a hew trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
34 Ga. App. 235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/norton-v-state-gactapp-1925.