Norton v. State

682 So. 2d 1232, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12242, 1996 WL 670556
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 20, 1996·No. No. 95-1553·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s convictions for armed burglary and aggravated battery but reverse the sentence because the trial court faded to state written reasons for the departure as required by section 921.0016(l)(c), Florida Statutes (1995), and rule 3.702(d)(18), Florida Rules Criminal Procedures On remand the resentencing should be within the guidelines. Pope v. State, 561 So.2d 554 (Fla.1990).

KLEIN, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Norton v. State, 682 So. 2d 1232, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12242, 1996 WL 670556 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

682 So. 2d 1232 (Norton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Norton v. State
731 So. 2d 762 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)