Norton v. State

242 So. 2d 880
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 14, 1971·No. No. O-83·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the order of the lower court is affirmed. See Gaskins v. State, 89 So.2d 867 (Fla.1956).

JOHNSON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and RAWLS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Norton v. State, 242 So. 2d 880 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).

242 So. 2d 880 (Norton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gaskins v. State
89 So. 2d 867 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1956)