Norton v. STATE, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM
37 So. 3d 979, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 9201, 2010 WL 2541709
Opinion
Having determined that the appellant’s notice of appeal failed to timely invoke the Court’s jurisdiction, the appeal is hereby dismissed. See Miami-Dade County v. Peart, 843 So.2d 363 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). Any remedy the appellant may have lies with the lower tribunal. C.f. W.T. Holding, Inc. v. AHCA, 682 So.2d 1224 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Norton v. STATE, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM, 37 So. 3d 979, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 9201, 2010 WL 2541709 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).
37 So. 3d 979 (Norton v. STATE, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Miami-Dade County v. Peart
843 So. 2d 363 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
WT Holding, Inc. v. State Agency for Health Care Admin.
682 So. 2d 1224 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)