Norton v. Springfield, Long Island, Cemetery Society

178 A.D. 924

This text of 178 A.D. 924 (Norton v. Springfield, Long Island, Cemetery Society) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Norton v. Springfield, Long Island, Cemetery Society, 178 A.D. 924 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

The motion for stay is denied, although we regard it important that the trial court consider whether the certificates are in accordance with the statute, and that the plaintiff should not recover a judgment that is enf'orcible to the prejudice of the mortgagees or the other certificate holders or lot owners. The Trial Term has the duty of determining whether the certificates should be reformed and in what regard; or, if that cannot be done without bringing in additional parties, the court has power to suspend the trial until such parties shall have been brought in. Present — Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Stapleton, Putnam and Blackmar, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
178 A.D. 924, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/norton-v-springfield-long-island-cemetery-society-nyappdiv-1917.