Norton v. Scruggs

34 S.E. 166, 108 Ga. 802, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 445
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 26, 1899·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Fish, J.

1. Leave extending, from the appearance to the trial term of cases, the right of a particular attorney at law to resist motions to strike petitions or pleas filed by him, did not of itself confer upon him the right at the trial term to amend his pleadings in any case.

2. When, however, the only defect in a plea of non est factum, filed by such attorney at the appearance term, was that the same had not been sworn to, and the plaintiff did not at that term move to strike the plea on this ground, it was erroneous, when such a motion was made at the trial term, not to allow the plea to be amended by having the same properly verified. Ward v. Frick Co., 95 Ga. 804.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Norton v. Scruggs, 34 S.E. 166, 108 Ga. 802, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 445 (Ga. 1899).

34 S.E. 166 (Norton v. Scruggs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ford v. Serenado Manufacturing Co.
109 S.E. 415 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)
Citizens & Southern Bank v. Blount
92 S.E. 758 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Bland v. Bird
67 S.E. 427 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1910)
Neal v. Davis Foundry & Machine Works
63 S.E. 221 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1908)