Norton v. Schriro

Eighth Circuit

Norton v. Schriro

71 F. App'x 603

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedAugust 6, 2003

DocketNo. 02-2540

StatusPublished

This text of 71 F. App'x 603 (Norton v. Schriro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Norton v. Schriro, 71 F. App'x 603 (8th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Missouri inmate Terry Norton appeals the district court’s¹ adverse entry of final judgment in his action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). After considering Norton’s arguments and carefully reviewing the record, we conclude that the dismissal of the ADA claims and the claims against the state defendants, as well as the grant of summary judgment to the Correctional Medical Services defendants, were proper; that the district court did not [604]*604abuse its discretion in denying Norton’s motions for appointment of counsel and recusal; and that an extended opinion is not warranted. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Missouri inmate Terry Norton appeals the district court’s¹ adverse entry of final judgment in his action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). After considering Norton’s arguments and carefully reviewing the record, we conclude that the dismissal of the ADA claims and the claims against the state defendants, as well as the grant of summary judgment to the Correctional Medical Services defendants, were proper; that the district court did not [604]*604abuse its discretion in denying Norton’s motions for appointment of counsel and recusal; and that an extended opinion is not warranted. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

71 F. App'x 603, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/norton-v-schriro-ca8-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack