Norton v. Schriro

Eighth Circuit

Norton v. Schriro

71 F. App'x 603

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided August 6, 2003·No. No. 02-2540·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Missouri inmate Terry Norton appeals the district court’s¹ adverse entry of final judgment in his action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). After considering Norton’s arguments and carefully reviewing the record, we conclude that the dismissal of the ADA claims and the claims against the state defendants, as well as the grant of summary judgment to the Correctional Medical Services defendants, were proper; that the district court did not [604] abuse its discretion in denying Norton’s motions for appointment of counsel and recusal; and that an extended opinion is not warranted. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Missouri inmate Terry Norton appeals the district court’s¹ adverse entry of final judgment in his action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). After considering Norton’s arguments and carefully reviewing the record, we conclude that the dismissal of the ADA claims and the claims against the state defendants, as well as the grant of summary judgment to the Correctional Medical Services defendants, were proper; that the district court did not [604] abuse its discretion in denying Norton’s motions for appointment of counsel and recusal; and that an extended opinion is not warranted. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Footnotes

Norton v. Schriro, 71 F. App'x 603 (8th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

71 F. App'x 603 (Norton v. Schriro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Footnotes

Related