Norton v. Rich

New York Supreme Court

Norton v. Rich

20 Johns. 475

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 15, 1823

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 20 Johns. 475 (Norton v. Rich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Norton v. Rich, 20 Johns. 475 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1823).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

That is a remedy which the party may have pending the suit; but he is, also, entitled to an attachment, after a judgment in his favour. The motion must be granted.

Mitchell objected, that items had been taxed in the bill for costs, on making a motion to change the venue in the

CBtiSG*

Although costs are not given on a motion [476]*476to change the venue in a cause, yet they abide the event, an(j the party may have them taxed, when final judgment is signed.

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

That is a remedy which the party may have pending the suit; but he is, also, entitled to an attachment, after a judgment in his favour. The motion must be granted.

Mitchell objected, that items had been taxed in the bill for costs, on making a motion to change the venue in the

CBtiSG*

Although costs are not given on a motion [476]*476to change the venue in a cause, yet they abide the event, an(j the party may have them taxed, when final judgment is signed.

Motion granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 Johns. 475, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/norton-v-rich-nysupct-1823.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack