Norton v. Ray
29 N.E. 662, 139 Mass. 230, 1885 Mass. LEXIS 70
Opinion
W. Allen, J.
The plaintiff’s only remedy is in equity. The case discloses a trust, and cannot be brought within the decisions in which it has been held that an action for money had and received will lie against a trustee by a cestui que trust to recover a liquidated sum due to him under the trust. Johnson v. Johnson, 120 Mass. 465, and cases cited. Davis v. Coburn, 128 Mass. 377. Judgment for the defendant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Norton v. Ray, 29 N.E. 662, 139 Mass. 230, 1885 Mass. LEXIS 70 (Mass. 1885).
29 N.E. 662 (Norton v. Ray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tchula Commercial Co. v. Jackson
111 So. 874 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1927)
Cavanagh v. O'Connor
194 Iowa 670 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1922)
Herrick v. Snow
47 A. 540 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1900)
Nodine v. Wright
1 P. 734 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1900)
Taft v. Stow
54 N.E. 506 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1899)
Jasper v. Hazen
44 N.W. 1018 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1890)