Norton v. Norton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Norton v. Norton

12 A.D.2d 1003, 211 N.Y.S.2d 458, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12496

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 23, 1961·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Order insofar as appealed from unanimously reversed, with $25 costs and disbursements and motion for leave to amend denied, with $10 costs. Memorandum: This action is one for divorce. The order granted upon this motion permitted the defendant to amend his answer to plead a counterclaim attacking the validity of a judgment of annullment of a former marriage of the plaintiff. The proposed counterclaim "was palpably insufficient on its face. (Arcuri v. Arcuri, 265 N. Y. 358.) (Appeal from part of an order of Steuben Special Term granting motion by defendant for leave to serve an amended answer and counterclaim.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Halpern and McClusky, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order insofar as appealed from unanimously reversed, with $25 costs and disbursements and motion for leave to amend denied, with $10 costs. Memorandum: This action is one for divorce. The order granted upon this motion permitted the defendant to amend his answer to plead a counterclaim attacking the validity of a judgment of annullment of a former marriage of the plaintiff. The proposed counterclaim "was palpably insufficient on its face. (Arcuri v. Arcuri, 265 N. Y. 358.) (Appeal from part of an order of Steuben Special Term granting motion by defendant for leave to serve an amended answer and counterclaim.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Halpern and McClusky, JJ.

Norton v. Norton, 12 A.D.2d 1003, 211 N.Y.S.2d 458, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12496 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

12 A.D.2d 1003 (Norton v. Norton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related