Norton v. Miller

50 A.2d 895, 139 N.J. Eq. 310, 1947 N.J. LEXIS 457
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 17, 1947·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Jayne, and reported at 133 N. J. Eq. 235.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Parker, Bodine, Donges, Hei-ibr, Perskie, Come, Wacheneeld, Eastwood, Wells, Baeebrty, Dill, Breund, McGeehan, McLean, JJ. 15.

For reversal — ISTone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Norton v. Miller, 50 A.2d 895, 139 N.J. Eq. 310, 1947 N.J. LEXIS 457 (N.J. 1947).

50 A.2d 895 (Norton v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hodes v. Dunsky
83 A.2d 17 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1951)
Hoffman v. Perkins
67 A.2d 210 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1949)
Diamonde v. Berkeley Township
59 A.2d 617 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1948)
Cline v. Kurzweil
58 A.2d 281 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1948)