Norton v. Matthews

Superior Court of New York

Norton v. Matthews

31 N.Y.S. 1131

CourtThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo

DecidedJanuary 7, 1895

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 31 N.Y.S. 1131 (Norton v. Matthews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Norton v. Matthews, 31 N.Y.S. 1131 (superctny 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellants having failed to print the evidence given upon the trial by the parties, the findings of fact made by the learned trial judge must be deemed to have been made upon sufficient evidence. The only question raised by the appeal, therefore, is whether the conclusions of law are warranted by the facts as found. Upon a careful consideration of this question we think they are. The judgment should be affirmed, with costs, upon the opinion filed below.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellants having failed to print the evidence given upon the trial by the parties, the findings of fact made by the learned trial judge must be deemed to have been made upon sufficient evidence. The only question raised by the appeal, therefore, is whether the conclusions of law are warranted by the facts as found. Upon a careful consideration of this question we think they are. The judgment should be affirmed, with costs, upon the opinion filed below.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 N.Y.S. 1131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/norton-v-matthews-superctny-1895.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack