Norton v. Matthews

The Superior Court of New York City

Norton v. Matthews

11 Misc. 711, 64 N.Y. St. Rep. 878

The Superior Court of New York City·Decided January 15, 1895·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appellants having failed to print the evidence given upon the trial by the parties, the findings of fact made by the learned trial judge must be deemed to have been made upon sufficient evidence. The only question raised by the appeal, therefore, is whether the conclusions of law are warranted by the facts as found. Upon a careful consideration of this question we think they are.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs, upon the opinion filed below.

Present: Freedman and Gildersleeve, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The appellants having failed to print the evidence given upon the trial by the parties, the findings of fact made by the learned trial judge must be deemed to have been made upon sufficient evidence. The only question raised by the appeal, therefore, is whether the conclusions of law are warranted by the facts as found. Upon a careful consideration of this question we think they are.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs, upon the opinion filed below.

Present: Freedman and Gildersleeve, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Norton v. Matthews, 11 Misc. 711, 64 N.Y. St. Rep. 878 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).

Pincite

11 Misc. 711 (Norton v. Matthews) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related