Norton v. Matthews

The Superior Court of New York City

Norton v. Matthews

11 Misc. 711, 64 N.Y. St. Rep. 878

CourtThe Superior Court of New York City

DecidedJanuary 15, 1895

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 11 Misc. 711 (Norton v. Matthews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Norton v. Matthews, 11 Misc. 711, 64 N.Y. St. Rep. 878 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appellants having failed to print the evidence given upon the trial by the parties, the findings of fact made by the learned trial judge must be deemed to have been made upon sufficient evidence. The only question raised by the appeal, therefore, is whether the conclusions of law are warranted by the facts as found. Upon a careful consideration of this question we think they are.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs, upon the opinion filed below.

Present: Freedman and Gildersleeve, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI