Norton v. Marsh
This text of 12 A.D.2d 993 (Norton v. Marsh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
.Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. (Appeal from judgment of Ontario Supreme Court in favor of defendants for $20,473.98 after adjustment of accounts following a trial before a jury of the separate issue of fraud which resulted in a verdict of $21,000 for defendants on their counterclaim. The trial court directed cancellation of the real estate mortgage and the chattel mortgage conditioned on return of properties by defendants.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, McClusky and Henry, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
12 A.D.2d 993, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12642, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/norton-v-marsh-nyappdiv-1961.