Norton v. Kurtz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Norton v. Kurtz

19 A.D.2d 896, 244 N.Y.S.2d 658, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2941

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 12, 1963

StatusPublished

This text of 19 A.D.2d 896 (Norton v. Kurtz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Norton v. Kurtz, 19 A.D.2d 896, 244 N.Y.S.2d 658, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2941 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion by respondent to dismiss, appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, County of Kings, dated July 2, 1963, which denied appellant’s motion to vacate and set aside respondent’s notice of examination before trial of appellant. This appeal was erroneously taken to this court. The Appellate Term of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department is presently vested with the jurisdiction of appeals from the Civil Court of the City of New York. Accordingly, the motion to dismiss the appeal and the appeal are transferred to said Appellate Term of the Supreme Court (see N. Y. Const., art. VI, § 5, subd. b; § 8, subd. d; order No. 47 of this court, dated July 12, 1962). Beldock, P. J., Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by respondent to dismiss, appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, County of Kings, dated July 2, 1963, which denied appellant’s motion to vacate and set aside respondent’s notice of examination before trial of appellant. This appeal was erroneously taken to this court. The Appellate Term of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department is presently vested with the jurisdiction of appeals from the Civil Court of the City of New York. Accordingly, the motion to dismiss the appeal and the appeal are transferred to said Appellate Term of the Supreme Court (see N. Y. Const., art. VI, § 5, subd. b; § 8, subd. d; order No. 47 of this court, dated July 12, 1962). Beldock, P. J., Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 A.D.2d 896, 244 N.Y.S.2d 658, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2941, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/norton-v-kurtz-nyappdiv-1963.