Norton v. Johnson

90 So. 865, 83 Fla. 117
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 27, 1922·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the orders aforesaid, and briefs and arguments of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said orders; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said orders of the Circuit Court be, and the same are hereby, affirmed.

Browne, C. J.,. and Taylor, Whitfield and West, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Norton v. Johnson, 90 So. 865, 83 Fla. 117 (Fla. 1922).

90 So. 865 (Norton v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.