Norton v. Hartford Fire Insurance
This text of 243 A.D. 677 (Norton v. Hartford Fire Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order reversed on the law and facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, on the ground that the moving papers fail to show any circumstances which render it necessary or proper to take Mr. Harvie’s deposition as provided in section 288 of the Civil Practice Act, or that Mr. Harvie is a necessary or material witness for the plaintiff on the trial of the action. All concur. (The order granted an examination before trial in an action upon a fire insurance policy.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
243 A.D. 677, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/norton-v-hartford-fire-insurance-nyappdiv-1935.