Norton v. Hartford Fire Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Norton v. Hartford Fire Insurance

243 A.D. 677

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1935·Published

Opinion

Order reversed on the law and facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, on the ground that the moving papers fail to show any circumstances which render it necessary or proper to take Mr. Harvie’s deposition as provided in section 288 of the Civil Practice Act, or that Mr. Harvie is a necessary or material witness for the plaintiff on the trial of the action. All concur. (The order granted an examination before trial in an action upon a fire insurance policy.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed on the law and facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, on the ground that the moving papers fail to show any circumstances which render it necessary or proper to take Mr. Harvie’s deposition as provided in section 288 of the Civil Practice Act, or that Mr. Harvie is a necessary or material witness for the plaintiff on the trial of the action. All concur. (The order granted an examination before trial in an action upon a fire insurance policy.)

Norton v. Hartford Fire Insurance, 243 A.D. 677 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

243 A.D. 677 (Norton v. Hartford Fire Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.